Informed consent law and the forgotten duty of physician inquiry.
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Abortion and compelled physician speech.
Informed consent mandates for abortion providers may infringe the First Amendment's freedom of speech. On the other hand, they may reinforce the physician's duty to obtain informed consent. Courts can promote both doctrines by ensuring that compelled physician speech pertains to medical facts about abortion rather than abortion ideology and that compelled speech is truthful and not misleading.
متن کاملColorado’s Law of Informed Consent: Sample Case
Patient who had been prescribed sulfa antibiotic drug to treat prostatitis, and who suffered seizure after taking drug, brought medical malpractice action against physician in which he asserted negligence and informed consent claims. The District Court, directed verdict for physician on informed consent claim, and entered judgment on jury verdict for physician on negligence claim. Patient appea...
متن کاملI-19: Informed Consent of Infertile Couples in Iran: Legal Controversies
s:3020:"1. Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran Iran 2. Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute, ACECR, Tehran Iran Informed consent is considered the most important step in clinical interventions. According to the Beauchamp’s definition the consent is: “...an a...
متن کاملThe federal government and academic texts as barriers to informed consent.
Informed patient consent for medical treatment is required by both law and medical ethics. Yet, both federal agencies and academicians are participating in the suppression of information about the heightened risk of breast cancer posed by oral contraceptives and induced abortion. There is historical precedent in the long-delayed acknowledgement of the smoking/lung cancer link. By law, a patient...
متن کاملInformed consent: patient's right or patient's duty?
The rule that a patient should give a free, fully-informed consent to any therapeutic intervention is traditionally thought to express merely a right of the patient against the physician, and a duty of the physician towards the patient. On this view, the patient may waive that right with impunity, a fact sometimes expressed in the notion of a right not to know. This paper argues that the rule a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Loyola University of Chicago law journal. Loyola University Chicago. School of Law
دوره 31 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000